Comments on: Slice of Sci Fi Interview Voting http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/ A fansite dedicated to the wonderful actress Bridget Regan. Mon, 06 Feb 2012 18:03:52 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3 By: flip http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1804 flip Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:30:13 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1804 LOTS needs a better time slot..Sunday at 8PM would help :-))))) Bridget I see is a Rainn Wilson fan...I do love The Office and him on it. LOTS needs a better time slot..Sunday at 8PM would help :-) ))))

Bridget I see is a Rainn Wilson fan…I do love The Office and him on it.

]]> By: flip http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1803 flip Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:25:23 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1803 @Sarah. I guess you are right. Certainly this show is a lot more expensive than a talk show or sitcom but I guess I was disappointed the ratings were less than 1/2 last year. So it is a profit margin thing too, I assume. I thought they might have expanded...but I certainly do not claim to have any background here. LOTS is on Saturday night at 5PM for me. I have NEVER watched it at that time, opting for other things. So I watch it on Hulu or You Tube (mythhero7 on you tube has them in high def.). But I am starting to record it at different times and different stations....this should boost ratings too. HA!! But god I hate ads....sorry Bridget, ads can be truly painful to watch. BTW...if you read the comments on the bottom of the link I posted the author explains more about the results too (as concurs with you). LOTS hit a 1.1 last season (versus here was 1.7)...but then again they have a lot of new actors versus a one Bruce Willis type sucking up all the revenue for one actor. @Sarah. I guess you are right. Certainly this show is a lot more expensive than a talk show or sitcom but I guess I was disappointed the ratings were less than 1/2 last year. So it is a profit margin thing too, I assume. I thought they might have expanded…but I certainly do not claim to have any background here.

LOTS is on Saturday night at 5PM for me. I have NEVER watched it at that time, opting for other things. So I watch it on Hulu or You Tube (mythhero7 on you tube has them in high def.). But I am starting to record it at different times and different stations….this should boost ratings too. HA!! But god I hate ads….sorry Bridget, ads can be truly painful to watch.

BTW…if you read the comments on the bottom of the link I posted the author explains more about the results too (as concurs with you). LOTS hit a 1.1 last season (versus here was 1.7)…but then again they have a lot of new actors versus a one Bruce Willis type sucking up all the revenue for one actor.

]]> By: Sarah http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1802 Sarah Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:01:25 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1802 Those aren't bad ratings. I wouldn't be worried. A show won't retain all it's original viewers, so those numbers are pretty much what we should expect. The fact that they're ranked 45 out of 129 is a better way to look at it, so they're ok. :) (But more Bridget is fine too.) Those aren’t bad ratings. I wouldn’t be worried. A show won’t retain all it’s original viewers, so those numbers are pretty much what we should expect. The fact that they’re ranked 45 out of 129 is a better way to look at it, so they’re ok. :) (But more Bridget is fine too.)

]]> By: fuat atalayer http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1800 fuat atalayer Fri, 20 Nov 2009 05:21:42 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1800 indeed. More Bridget :) , no problem indeed. More Bridget :) , no problem

]]> By: Flip http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1796 Flip Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:15:04 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1796 The answer is easy on the ratings..NOT enough Bridget.. :-))) The answer is easy on the ratings..NOT enough Bridget.. :-) ))

]]> By: Flip http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1795 Flip Thu, 19 Nov 2009 21:13:30 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1795 Crap...ratings did not come in well for episode 1 season 2....last year was 5.4m. ------------ Legend of the Seeker season two premiere averages 2.58 million viewers Posted on 18 November 2009 by Robert Seidman The season two premiere of Legend of the Seeker averaged 2.583 million viewers the weekend of November 7-8 with a 1.7 household rating. By household rating it was ranked tied for 45th out of 129 syndicated shows measured for the week. The 2.583 million was the average audience, but you might wind up seeing the number 3.528 million thrown around, too. That’s the gross average audience for the premiere. Gross average audience is a metric commonly used in syndicated ratings where viewing of repeat broadcasts during the measured period *is* counted. But for apples-to-apples purposes of comparing to other shows you should use the 2.583 million number. http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/11/18/legend-of-the-seeker-season-two-premiere-averages-2-58-million-viewers/33889 Crap…ratings did not come in well for episode 1 season 2….last year was 5.4m.
————

Legend of the Seeker season two premiere averages 2.58 million viewers

Posted on 18 November 2009 by Robert Seidman

The season two premiere of Legend of the Seeker averaged 2.583 million viewers the weekend of November 7-8 with a 1.7 household rating. By household rating it was ranked tied for 45th out of 129 syndicated shows measured for the week.

The 2.583 million was the average audience, but you might wind up seeing the number 3.528 million thrown around, too. That’s the gross average audience for the premiere. Gross average audience is a metric commonly used in syndicated ratings where viewing of repeat broadcasts during the measured period *is* counted. But for apples-to-apples purposes of comparing to other shows you should use the 2.583 million number.

http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/11/18/legend-of-the-seeker-season-two-premiere-averages-2-58-million-viewers/33889

]]> By: Cait http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1793 Cait Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:33:41 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1793 She's at 103 so far! Awesome. She’s at 103 so far! Awesome.

]]> By: fuat atalayer http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1783 fuat atalayer Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:54:34 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1783 *for her :P *for her :P

]]> By: fuat atalayer http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1782 fuat atalayer Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:52:07 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1782 i voted gor her ofcourse. suprise? noooooo. :) :D hehe i voted gor her ofcourse. suprise? noooooo.
:) :D hehe

]]> By: flip http://herblueeyes.com/2009/11/16/slice-of-sci-fi-interview-voting/comment-page-1/#comment-1780 flip Tue, 17 Nov 2009 19:06:47 +0000 http://herblueeyes.com/?p=942#comment-1780 Bridget 61...next person 7 HA!!! FYI.... LOTS came in last year with 5.8m views for episode 1, putting it in the top 10..easily. Later episodes cam in at 4-5m. Very respectable, and hence a season 2. In the few days should be their opener numbers for season 2 (coming out today). If over 5m again I would expect a season 3 a done deal. THis is fun stuff to research. http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/11/10/syndicated-ratings-top-25-oprah-still-the-number-one-talker/33326 Bridget 61…next person 7 HA!!!

FYI….
LOTS came in last year with 5.8m views for episode 1, putting it in the top 10..easily. Later episodes cam in at 4-5m. Very respectable, and hence a season 2.
In the few days should be their opener numbers for season 2 (coming out today). If over 5m again I would expect a season 3 a done deal. THis is fun stuff to research.
http://tvbythenumbers.com/2009/11/10/syndicated-ratings-top-25-oprah-still-the-number-one-talker/33326

]]>